The influence of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on wild birds and their habitats


On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded the territory of Ukraine. This threatened not solely Ukraine’s inhabitants but additionally biodiversity, together with a big variety of uncommon and globally susceptible chicken species.

Whereas it’s not possible to make a thought-about evaluation of the size of the environmental influence of the Russian invasion, earlier scientific evaluations (Dudley et al., 2002, Lawrence et al., 2015) have recognized the vary of results of conflict on wildlife and habitats.  Due to this fact, we might make sure assumptions in regards to the destruction of the setting and the unfavorable influence on biodiversity brought on by Russian aggression on the territory of Ukraine.

The dimensions of navy affect is intensive, protecting your entire territory of Ukraine. The character and depth of the conflict is characterised by excessive aggression and complete destruction of the setting.

Aerial bombing, use of drones, artillery shelling and all different current forms of floor fight and mining destroy not solely settlements with all of the infrastructure, but additionally the pure setting. It’s protected to imagine that navy actions will considerably have an effect on the state of chicken populations in Ukraine.

Tengmalm’s Owl, copyright Ole Krogh, from the surfbirds galleries

Ukraine is internationally vital for wild birds: 434 species, 18 globally threatened birds, 19 species for which the nation hosts greater than 15% of the European inhabitants (see the record under taken from the European Crimson Record of Birds) an 141 Essential Bird Areas protecting 2.5 million hectares.  All of them are underneath the specter of direct and oblique affect of navy actions.  The possible impacts are outlined under.

Habitat loss: Within the zone of lively hostilities (northern, japanese and southern components of Ukraine, complete space 288,266 hectares) large-scale destruction of the pure setting has already been noticed:

  • Giant land areas of pure and agricultural landscapes are coated by quite a few deep funnels from plane bombs, missiles and artillery shells.  This destroys the habitat for birds (e.g. Gray Partridge, Skylark, Brief-eared Owl and Montague’s Harrier) in addition to different biodiversity.
  • On wetlands, particularly within the Dnieper and Desna rivers basins, there’s a disruption (in some circumstances vital) of the hydrological regime as a result of destruction of hydraulic constructions and bridges.  This may scale back the realm of habitats for wetland birds.
  • Because of bombings and rocket assaults, there have been large-scale forest fires (Chornobyl zone) and fires within the reed thickets in river floodplains (Azov-Black Sea area) destroying the habitats of forest chicken species (e.g. Black Stork, Black Kite, Brief-toed Eagle, Lesser Noticed, Black Grouse, Capercaillie, Eagle Owl, Nice Gray, and Frequent Crane) and wetland species (e.g. Nice White, Bittern, Spoonbill, Shiny Ibis, Purple Heron, Shoveler, Gadwall, Pochard).

Lack of nesting websites: Some birds are liable to imminent lack of nesting websites. The White Stork is especially susceptible to habitat loss, as its nests are situated in settlements which might be utterly destroyed by bombing and shelling. Air strikes on farm constructing delayed agriculture actions and had a excessive influence on Little Owl as a result of livestock farm is its foremost habitat on the North of Ukraine. We count on a significant inhabitants decline for this species as a result of a lot of the farms have been destroyed within the areas of lively combating.

Native extinction: As a result of fixed shelling within the space of the Black and Azov Seas bays with their islands and spits, the place colonial species historically nest (e.g. White Pelican, Shag, Mediterranean Gull, Nice Black-headed Gull, Slender-billed Gull, Caspian Tern, Little Tern and Sandwich Tern) there’s a risk of native extinction with the lack of tens of 1000’s birds.

Disturbance: it’s anticipated that in the course of the conflict native folks will begin to lower forest illegally for dwelling heating, inflicting disturbance to and affecting the habitats of forest-specialist species (e.g. Nice Gray Owl, Tengmalm’s Owl and Black Stork).

Habitat air pollution: intensive contamination of the territory with the elements of mines, bombs, artillery shells, agricultural chemical compounds from destroyed warehouses can have a robust unfavorable influence on biodiversity and, particularly, birds by means of poisoned meals sources.

Searching stress: it’s potential that the looking stress of the native inhabitants on massive birds (e.g. geese, Black grouse, Capercaillie, Hazel Grouse, Mallard, Pochard and Teal) might enhance because of meals shortages in the course of the occupation blockade.

After the conflict a radical evaluation of the general environmental impacts can be wanted to establish targets for future conservation exercise, together with clean-up operations.  Long run prospects for Ukrainian wildlife will rely upon re-establishment of efficient administration of protected areas, habitat restoration and sustainable administration of the nation’s farmed landscapes.

Lastly, reconnecting folks to nature (particularly younger folks) can be extremely vital for psychological therapeutic to assist folks recuperate from the conflict trauma.

USPB and its companions stands able to assist the Ukrainian Authorities to reinvigorate a conservation programme to revive our cherished landscapes for folks and for wildlife.


Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here