Tenancy Tribunal: Rabbit possession breeds points for tenant and landlord alike


In opposition to her landlords’ needs, a tenant ended up with 18 rabbits after she did not desex the unique 3. Picture / Inventory Picture 123rf

A tenant who did not desex her three rabbits ended up with greater than 18 bunnies in her care, resulting in a stoush with the landlords after they had been caught peeking via her home windows to keep watch over the pets.

The tenant and the landlords, all of whom have identify suppression, developed a friendship all through the course of the tenancy however a tribunal has discovered this wholly deteriorated over the rabbit state of affairs.

After the tenant captured footage of the landlords and their buddies peering into her house, she had grow to be “frightened” and moved out.

She later made a declare to the Tenancy Tribunal that she had been harassed by the landlords, who then made counter purposes towards the lady.

The tribunal’s just lately launched choice, which dismisses each events’ purposes, units out the rabbit-related row.

It mentioned the tenant moved into the agricultural one-bedroom unit in November 2021.

Adjoining to the unit was a shed and an workplace which had been utilized by the landlords, who resided round 50 metres from the tenant in a separate dwelling, for work functions.

The tenancy settlement acknowledged the tenant may have two “bunny rabbits”, though it was agreed between the events that she was truly permitted to have three.

Nonetheless, the landlords informed the tribunal the rabbits had been to be stored within the shed or outdoors and that they had been meant to be desexed.

Whereas the tenant claimed there was no settlement concerning the rabbits not being allowed inside, she agreed the plan was to have them outdoors or within the shed.

The rabbit-row became a matter for the Tenancy Tribunal. Photo / Stock Image 123rfThe rabbit-row grew to become a matter for the Tenancy Tribunal. Picture / Inventory Picture 123rf

The tenant additionally mentioned it was her intention to have the 2 feminine pets desexed.

“Sadly, there was a window of alternative the place all three rabbits not being
desexed meant that the 2 feminine pets received pregnant,” the choice acknowledged.

In February this yr, the 2 litters had been born, which means the lady went on to have at the very least 18 rabbits in her care.

She wished to maintain the infants inside the home and informed the tribunal a dialogue was had with the landlords who informed her they weren’t eager on there being animals contained in the unit however acknowledged the pets had been weak.

The landlords, nevertheless, informed the tribunal they weren’t in settlement with them being inside as they had been apprehensive about injury being prompted and it far exceeded the unique agreed upon variety of rabbits.

Quickly sufficient, the landlords started regarding themselves with the whereabouts of the rabbits and their situation.

This grew to become apparent to the tenant when she captured on a safety digicam that, in her absence, the landlords and their buddies had been trying via the home windows and doorways of her unit, with one particular person urinating outdoors and one other making an attempt to open a window to realize entry to the property.

“Because of the landlords’ alleged conduct, the tenant felt so frightened that she
determined to maneuver out. The tenant vacated the premises on March 27, 2022.”

Two days later, she returned to collect her belongings with police.

After the tenant filed her utility with the tribunal, claiming she was harrassed throughout the course of the tenancy and that her quiet enjoyment was thereby disturbed, the landlords filed theirs.

They claimed the lady breached the tenancy settlement when she allowed rabbits that weren’t desexed to stay contained in the unit and when she didn’t take away the newborn rabbits.

Within the different utility, they claimed compensation in relation to alleged unpaid hire, cleansing prices, refilling of fuel bottles, and backyard works which included holes brought on by the rabbits.

The landlords refuted the tenant’s claims that there was any harassment.

They are saying they needed to stroll previous her window to go to a different paddock and that once they peered in, this was so as to see what was occurring with the rabbits.

Equally, the tenant denied she was chargeable for any unpaid hire or cleansing prices, and argued she had already paid for the fuel and the backyard work.

She was adamant that the rabbits didn’t create any holes.

Following two hearings on the matter, the tribunal dominated it was a time period of the tenancy settlement that the lady was permitted to have three rabbits and that they wanted to be desexed upon arrival.

“It was certainly the state of affairs with the rabbits which led the connection to bitter. I consider that any cheap landlord on this state of affairs would have grow to be disgruntled at a tenant who introduced rabbits that weren’t desexed onto a property which then instantly produced numerous different rabbits.”

The tribunal acknowledged the landlords and their buddies had appeared contained in the tenant’s home however discovered they solely did so as a result of they had been curious to see what was occurring with the pets.

There was no established sample of harrassment, the tribunal dominated, dismissing the lady’s declare.

The landlords purposes had been additionally dismissed because of a scarcity of proof.

The tribunal ordered the $1600 bond to be returned to the lady.


Subscribe Us To Receive Our Latest News In Your Inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here